China Clears Professional-Degree Graduates to Apply With Practice Outcomes Instead of Theses
China's Office of the State Council Academic Degrees Committee has issued guidance allowing professional-degree graduate students to apply for their degrees on the basis of practice outcomes rather than a conventional thesis, the Ministry of Education confirmed on Oct 19. The move puts legal weight behind a form of assessment long standard in professional doctorates in other systems.
The first batch covers five professional degree categories: translation, agriculture, clinical medicine, accounting and fine arts. Each professional-degree steering committee will be directed to draft discipline-specific basic requirements at both master's and doctoral level, setting out what counts as an acceptable practice outcome, its required structure, writing standards and evaluation criteria. Batches will be released according to how mature each document is and how strong industry collaboration is in that field.
The legal basis is the Academic Degrees Law passed in April 2024, which for the first time stated at national-law level that graduate students may apply for a degree through either a thesis defence or a defence of prescribed practice outcomes. Engineering moved first: in September 2024 it published basic requirements for doctoral professional degrees, and more than 140 engineering master's and doctoral students in a dedicated pilot have since been awarded degrees on the basis of practice outcomes, producing a set of reusable cases.
Under the guidance, a practice outcome must be completed independently by the student under supervision, or as the main contributor to its core content - a contribution-attribution standard that institutions are told to enforce strictly. Outcomes are to be judged on their applied value in professional practice, their innovative character and their social contribution, with emphasis on the ability to solve real problems.
The stated aim is to steer degree-granting institutions toward an evaluation system that treats theses and practice outcomes as equally valid. Officials argued that as demand for applied high-level talent has grown and professional-degree enrolments have expanded, the thesis-only approach cannot adequately reflect what professional-degree students achieve through practice and innovation.
Industry is expected to be deeply involved. The guidance assigns industry mentors defined roles in topic selection, supervision, outcome appraisal and defence, and calls for a larger share of industry experts on appraisal and defence panels, backed by conflict-of-interest and fair-evaluation rules. Institutions are also told to share resources, co-develop standards and build joint mechanisms with industry across programme design, teaching, practical training, degree awarding and outcome commercialisation.
Quality control runs through several channels. Provincial education authorities will organise random reviews of practice outcomes submitted for master's degrees, with results feeding into enrolment quota allocation, resource distribution and award selection. A dedicated reviewer pool will be built, the mechanism will be folded into degree-programme accreditation, and programmes that cannot guarantee outcome quality face sanctions. The guidance also asks for a fault-tolerance mechanism to protect institutions and supervisors experimenting with the reform.
Institutions must publish detailed implementation rules covering topic selection, supervision and assessment, and file them with the relevant steering committee. The document additionally calls for clearer rules on intellectual-property ownership and revenue sharing for practice outcomes, and for stronger practice bases, commercialisation offices and service platforms so that strong outcomes reach industry and public services.
Officials stressed the reform remains exploratory and should not be rolled out uniformly: institutions are told to follow a pilot, evaluate, then scale rhythm and to advance category by category. Aligning China's professional degrees with practice-based assessment also narrows a gap with systems in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, where capstone projects, clinical residencies and portfolio assessments routinely substitute for or sit alongside the conventional thesis.
The first batch covers five professional degree categories: translation, agriculture, clinical medicine, accounting and fine arts. Each professional-degree steering committee will be directed to draft discipline-specific basic requirements at both master's and doctoral level, setting out what counts as an acceptable practice outcome, its required structure, writing standards and evaluation criteria. Batches will be released according to how mature each document is and how strong industry collaboration is in that field.
The legal basis is the Academic Degrees Law passed in April 2024, which for the first time stated at national-law level that graduate students may apply for a degree through either a thesis defence or a defence of prescribed practice outcomes. Engineering moved first: in September 2024 it published basic requirements for doctoral professional degrees, and more than 140 engineering master's and doctoral students in a dedicated pilot have since been awarded degrees on the basis of practice outcomes, producing a set of reusable cases.
Under the guidance, a practice outcome must be completed independently by the student under supervision, or as the main contributor to its core content - a contribution-attribution standard that institutions are told to enforce strictly. Outcomes are to be judged on their applied value in professional practice, their innovative character and their social contribution, with emphasis on the ability to solve real problems.
The stated aim is to steer degree-granting institutions toward an evaluation system that treats theses and practice outcomes as equally valid. Officials argued that as demand for applied high-level talent has grown and professional-degree enrolments have expanded, the thesis-only approach cannot adequately reflect what professional-degree students achieve through practice and innovation.
Industry is expected to be deeply involved. The guidance assigns industry mentors defined roles in topic selection, supervision, outcome appraisal and defence, and calls for a larger share of industry experts on appraisal and defence panels, backed by conflict-of-interest and fair-evaluation rules. Institutions are also told to share resources, co-develop standards and build joint mechanisms with industry across programme design, teaching, practical training, degree awarding and outcome commercialisation.
Quality control runs through several channels. Provincial education authorities will organise random reviews of practice outcomes submitted for master's degrees, with results feeding into enrolment quota allocation, resource distribution and award selection. A dedicated reviewer pool will be built, the mechanism will be folded into degree-programme accreditation, and programmes that cannot guarantee outcome quality face sanctions. The guidance also asks for a fault-tolerance mechanism to protect institutions and supervisors experimenting with the reform.
Institutions must publish detailed implementation rules covering topic selection, supervision and assessment, and file them with the relevant steering committee. The document additionally calls for clearer rules on intellectual-property ownership and revenue sharing for practice outcomes, and for stronger practice bases, commercialisation offices and service platforms so that strong outcomes reach industry and public services.
Officials stressed the reform remains exploratory and should not be rolled out uniformly: institutions are told to follow a pilot, evaluate, then scale rhythm and to advance category by category. Aligning China's professional degrees with practice-based assessment also narrows a gap with systems in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, where capstone projects, clinical residencies and portfolio assessments routinely substitute for or sit alongside the conventional thesis.
JMDedu is a leading B2B EdTech Media in China that informs and connects business professionals through our reports, events, and information services. Our mission is to drive the advancement of education. Our network spans the education industry in China as well as globally, including entrepreneurs, investors, startups, educators, business decision-makers, and policy decision-makers.
Copyright © 2014-2026 en.jmdedu.com All Rights Reserved